![packrat scoring packrat scoring](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zlkLVoj3wLY/maxresdefault.jpg)
It's already a federal crime to buy a pistol in one state when you live in another state, and it's nearly impossible to buy a long gun in one state and take it to another.
![packrat scoring packrat scoring](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/aIwAAOSwjJFfZb8B/s-l225.jpg)
If you don't have an FOID in Illinois, thats also a state crime. It's already a crime to transport a gun into Chicago from the rest of the state. Lets look at the NY Times article you quote. I posted two comments earlier that I'd posted there successfully. You don’t deserve a single privilege of “women’s lib”.Īt this article at Clareified, Dawn talks about gun control. IMHO, you should revoke your own right to vote, break out the corset, and make sure not to be seen out in strong sunlight. If you don’t have it, call Glock at 77 or go back to Tony and have him get one for you. Every problem you’re having is entirely caused by failing to read the instructions. This is on the order of a parent screaming “No one told me that I shouldn’t let my kid drink lye and pour it on his face” or “but the store SOLD me that rat poison”. Women rejected the concept that they were too delicate to participate in the political process, and finally got the vote.Īnd now, at the pinnacle of personal capability, you spend an entire article basically whining that the entire country, including Tony, didn’t stop you from being too stupid to read a simple manual. Some of us enslaved an entire set of people because they were “not capable” of personhood, but then the entire country shed blood to prove that set wrong. Our history has been full of people who refused to treat others like children. Your entire article is “I am too scared to do this right and too proud to admit it.” If you believe that you’re a good feminist, you should turn in your card right now and go join the local Sarah Palin fan club (although those ladies could at least help you learn how to handle that gun better). Yewman, you are showing the whole world why the Victorians thought women had the vapors and were too delicate for any activity more involved than needlework and cucumber sandwiches. I commented on her inability to handle basic gun safety in a comment not likely to get posted:
![packrat scoring packrat scoring](https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/h10AAOSwjXZcslPw/s-l1200.jpg)
Magazine's authors got the vapors trying to carry a gun. These little baby Christians being allowed to roam the hinterlands with their Sunday School understanding of God and no connection with the Holy Spirit are being done an eternal disservice. Christ makes it clear that those who reject Him in front of men will be rejected. Once you are in the position of either being a martyr or rejecting Christianity, any Christian MUST choose martyrdom, or risk losing his eternal soul. However, there are those who are called to it, and there are those to whom it is thrust upon. There are millions upon millions of Christians alive today who will never see any opportunity to be a martyr, and will not be called to it. No Christian is obligated to seek out martyrdom from a standing stop. We were to pick up our crosses and follow Him. However, Christ didn't say we would avoid these He said that people would bring all of these upon us because of Himself. We want to avoid pain, to avoid suffering, to keep out of trouble. Our human nature wants to hold on to this life with both hands. This is so very wrong, I can barely contain myself. “A Christian is not obliged to be a martyr.” “You can’t condemn people who are afraid of dying and so don’t show themselves as Catholic,” Cardinal Amato said. In the article, they quote a cardinal of the Catholic Church: I was commenting on the post "Four Months Ago" on Ann Althouse's site, when I realized that the original article she's quoted had a horrible mistake.